Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Classification of Mainstream Methods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

The dataset visualization.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Combined dataset distribution.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Details of these features.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Setting an upper limit.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The proposed methodology framework.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The process of the stack model.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

The confusion matrix.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Accuracy comparison with base classifiers and the proposed stacking model.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of the proposed stacking model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Overall performance of base classifiers and the proposed stacking model.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of performance evaluation metrics between baseline and adjusted models.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

Performance comparison before and after tuning.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 10.

The 5-fold cross-validation for the determination of best hyperparameter values for XGBoost.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of the most successful accuracy rates on the same and different data sets.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of results.

More »

Fig 11 Expand