Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comprehensive comparison of state-of-the-art approaches.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Architecture of proposed system model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

System model of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Schematic representation of univariate ensemble-based feature selection.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Flow diagram for the proposed methodology.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Simulation parameters of DDcGAN.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Simulation parameters of SDN network.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance metrics.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Network simulation of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Accuracy analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with existing techniques.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

F1-score analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with existing methods.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Precision analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with current approaches.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM delay with existing techniques.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Energy consumption analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with existing methods.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Energy consumption analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with existing approaches.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Throughput analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with prevailing approaches.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

True positive rate (TPR) analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with existing techniques.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

False alarm rate analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM with existing approaches.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Specificity comparison of DDcGAN-GSOM with prevailing methods.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Discriminator loss of suggested technique.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Generator loss of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 5.

Comparative analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM’s Accuracy, Precision, and F1-score.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Comparative analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM’s Energy Consumption, Throughput, and Dealy.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparative analysis of DDcGAN-GSOM’s True Positive Rate, False Alarm Rate, and Specificity.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Performance comparison of proposed system with state-of-the-art approaches.

More »

Table 8 Expand