Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Morphological, hemodynamic, structural mechanical, and derived parameters overview.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Workflow of the series of statistical analyses performed.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive analysis of demographic and clinical parameters with group differences assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. AHT = Arterial hypertension, vs = versus, SD = standard deviation.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results from statistical U-test Analysis for investigating hemodynamic (3.a.), structural mechanical (3.b.), and morphological parameters (3.c.).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Exemplary results of WSS, OSI, displacement and MISES in a ruptured aneurysm; on the left selected morphological, hemodynamic and structural mechanical parameters of this aneruysm are given.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Pearson coefficients of hemodynamic (a), structural mechanical (b), and morphological (c) parameters.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95%CI), and p-value in univariate and multivariate regression analysis between ruptured and stable aneurysms for hemodynamic, structural mechanical, and morphological parameters. RA = Regression Analysis, OR = Odds Ratio.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Results from statistical U-test analysis for additional parameters.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Area under the curve (AUC) values, sensitivity, specificity, and corresponding threshold values of all remaining parameters.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 3.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for all parameters.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 8.

Internal validation (n = 25) for all remaining parameters, sensitivity of individual parameters, and number of correctly identified aneurysms as ruptured.

More »

Table 8 Expand