Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Comparison of species identities detected by RESL, ASAP and clades containing final species assignments [9].

The original tree [9] was modified by adding BIN partitions and collapsing clades to the respective BIN partitions and hatching areas, indicating non-monophyletic BIN species identities formatted by the RESL algorithm. The BINs, ASAP partitions and final species assignments are differentiated within subgenera by the inner, middle and outer color strips. White stripes indicate that an assignment to a species identity was not possible. Colors were used only once within a single subgenus.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Classes of errors and gaps in BOLD metadata.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Selection of BOLD query results deviating from reference BINs. A complete overview of BOLD queries can be found in the supplement (S2 Table in S1 File).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Publication state and identification method of sequences assigned to species.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Proportion of errors and gaps in BOLD annotations of Tachina records (n = 812) obtained from BOLD.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Recommendations to amend the BOLD engine. Recommendations in bold text are considered in BOLD v5.

More »

Table 3 Expand