Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Overall Architecture of the Proposed Method.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Stroke dataset and their values/types.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Formation of multimodal dataset for stroke risk prediction.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Federated MLP-GRU architecture for stroke risk prediction.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of the number of individuals with and without stroke.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Reading, resizing, normalizing, and visualizing images the MRI images.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of Stroke Between (A) Gender vs stroke (B) Smoking Status vs Stroke.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Number of individuals with and without stroke.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparative analysis between (A) Age, (B) Glucose, (C) BMI, and (D) Hypertension Distribution among Individuals.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Relationship between(A) Age, (B) Glucose Level, and Stroke Occurrence.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Pairplot of Heart Disease, Stroke, Hypertension, BMI, Average Glucose Level, and Age.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Correlation matrix of health parameters and stroke risk factors.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Training and Validation Accuracy of (A) Client 1, (B) Client 2, (C) Client 3 and (D) Global Model.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Training and Validation Loss of(A) Client 1, (B) Client 2, (C) Client 3 and (D) Global Model.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Confusion matrix for stroke prediction.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Actual vs predicted of the brain CT images.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

ROC curve for ML models.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Evaluation metrics of the proposed method.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 2.

Performance evaluation of the proposed method with other existing approaches.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 18.

Comparative evaluation of the suggested and current approaches.

More »

Fig 18 Expand