Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

Table 1.

Positional frequencies of time expressions in the conversational corpus.

More »

Table 1 Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

More »

Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of acceptability ratings for time expressions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

LME analysis results for time expressions in different positions.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Acceptability ratings for time expressions in different positions.

Note. *** p < .001. The values represent means of acceptability ratings, and the values after ± indicate standard errors. △ represents the difference in acceptability ratings.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Acceptability ratings for time expressions in pre-/post-subject positions.

Note. The values for the time adverbs 忽然 and 随后 on the left of the parentheses indicate acceptability scores in the post-subject position, while the values on the right indicate scores in the pre-subject position.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Descriptive statistics for accuracies in Chinese sentences.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

LME analysis results for accuracies in Chinese sentences.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Descriptive statistics for reaction times in Chinese sentences (ms).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

LME analysis results for reaction times in Chinese sentences.

More »

Table 7 Expand