Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Outcome variables list and measurement.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Spotify auditory features definitions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for AM Likert ratings.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Scree plot of PCA components.

Predictor variables included in PCA include nine auditory features: acousticness, danceability, energy, instrumentalness, liveness, loudness, speechiness, tempo and valence.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Scatterplots of E-A and each auditory feature.

Correlation values are indicated in the top left corner of each scatterplot.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Estimate, standard error, t-value and p-values of linear mixed effects models of E-A for each outcome variable.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Estimate, standard error, z-value and p-values of mixed effects logistic regressions of E-A on reporting each outcome variable.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Plots showing E-A and outcome variables.

A. Scatterplots and sigmoid function plots of E-A and MEAM emotional content outcomes B. Scatterplots of E-A and non-LIWC phenomenological characteristics. C. Scatterplots and sigmoid function plot of E-A and cue efficiency outcomes. D. Sigmoid function plots of E-A and LIWC phenomenological characteristic outcomes. Significance indicated as follows: *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Occurrence of reported AM-associated categorical emotions.

Values reflect sum of times each emotion was reported as associated with an AM. The top fourteen most commonly reported emotions used in analyses are indicated in dark blue.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Sigmoid function plots of top emotion categories.

Significant models are indicated with asterisks as follows: * = significant at α = 0.0035 (0.05/14); ** = significant at α = 0.0007 (.01/14); *** = significant at α = 0.00007 (.001/14).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

P-value heatmaps of mixed-effects models including individual auditory features as independent predictors of MEAM outcome variables.

Note that E-A was not included as a predictor in these models but is added to these plots to allow the reader to compare the two analysis approaches. A. P-value heatmap for outcome variables excluding LIWC and categorical emotions. B. P-value heatmap for categorical emotions. C. P-value heatmap for LIWC categories. For plots A and C, * = significant at α = 0.05, ** = significant at α = 0.01, ** = significant at α = 0.001. For plot B, * = significant at α = 0.0035, ** = significant at α = 0.0007, ** = significant at α = 0.00007 reflecting Bonferroni corrections.

More »

Fig 6 Expand