Fig 1.
The load-velocity relationships obtained from the data averaged across the participants modelled by the standard method (balck regression line) and modified multiple-point methods at different highest submaixmal load (gray regression lines) during back squat exercise.
Mean values are shown for six loading conditions (20, 40, 60, 70, 80, and 90% 1RM) and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Fig 2.
The load-velocity relationships obtained from the data averaged across the participants modelled by the standard method (balck regression line) and five in-field two-point methods at different heavy load (gray regression lines) during back squat exercise.
Mean values are shown for six loading conditions (20, 40, 60, 70, 80, and 90% 1RM) and the error bars represent the standard deviation.
Table 1.
The load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables obatined from different method (standard method, multiple-point methods at different highest submaixmal load and in-field two-point methods at different heavy load) during back squat exercise.
Table 2.
Comparison of the load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables obtained by the modified multiple-point methods at different highest submaixmal load with respect to the standard method during back squat exercise.
Table 3.
Comparison of the load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables obtained by in-field two-point method at different heavy load with respect to the standard method during back squat exercise.
Table 4.
Barbell velocity of heavy load from in-field two-point method and standard method.