Table 1.
Key outcomes and method of QS competency gap related research.
Fig 1.
The onion model and the corresponding competency domains.
Table 2.
Mapping of original literature constructs to final 20 QS competency indicators. Source: own research.
Fig 2.
Conceptual framework.
Table 3.
Research on QS competency standards. Source: own research.
Table 4.
Criteria for competency gap using .
Table 5.
Reliability and validity statistics on the competency indicator groups of each dimension.
Table 6.
Gap values of the 4 domains and 20 competency indicators.
Table 7.
Summary of competency gap findings across domains and key indicators.
Table 8.
Hypothesis results.