Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Within-session descriptive statistics for peak force measurements, per device and testing day.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Within-session ICCs3.1, 95%CIs, SEM and MDC estimates for both devices and limbs, according to testing day.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Between-session descriptive statistics, ICCs, 95%CIs, SEM and MDC estimates for both devices, according to limb.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Within-session agreement between devices for hip flexion peak force measurement (both limbs and testing days).

Note: The Y axis (difference between devices) at 0 indicates perfect agreement; positive values show the ForceFrame recorded greater values, whereas negative values show the Belt-stabilised handheld dynamometer recorded greater values. Thick black lines correspond to 95% limits of agreement, dashed black lines represent observed mean agreement. Key: B-HHD = Belt-stabilised handheld dynamometer; diff = difference, FF = ForceFrame; LOA = limits of agreement; n = newtons.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Within-session agreement between devices for hip extension peak force measurement (both limbs and testing days).

Note: The Y axis (difference between devices) at 0 indicates perfect agreement; positive values show the Forceframe recorded greater values, whereas negative values show the Belt-stabilised handheld dynamometer recorded greater values. Thick black lines correspond to 95% limits of agreement, dashed black lines represent observed mean agreement. Key: B-HHD = Belt-stabilised handheld dynamometer; diff = difference, FF = ForceFrame; LOA = limits of agreement; n = newtons.

More »

Fig 2 Expand