Fig 1.
Flow diagram of participant selection of adults employed in Lebanon prior to the concurrent crises. a At this stage, we further assessed participants’ employment status and sex to enable oversampling of employed women in line with national estimates. b When collecting retrospective data on employment, we did not ask about employment characteristics and history for individuals whose last job fell beyond 10-year recall period (i.e., whose last job ended in or before 2014).
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study sample stratified by employment attrition during the concurrent crises in Lebanon (2020-2023) (n = 2103).
Table 2.
Predictors of employment attrition during the concurrent crises in Lebanon.
Fig 2.
Calibration plot of the prediction model for employment attrition during the concurrent crises in Lebanon.
The dashed diagonal line represents perfect calibration. Whiskers, 95% confidence intervals (CIs); O.E, observed-to-expected ratio; CITL, calibration-in-the-large; and AUC, the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve.
Table 3.
Association between employment attrition during the concurrent crises in Lebanon (2020-2023) and pre-existing chronic conditions.
Fig 3.
Odds of employment attrition during the concurrent crises in Lebanon (2020-2023) at different ages among individuals with and without pre-existing chronic conditions.