Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The direction of the magnetic force [1].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The radius of this circular motion.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

MOSRS’s pseudocode.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Flowchart of MOSRS algorithm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Hardest general multi-objective problems.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Commonly used metaheuristics Hyperparameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Real design multi-objective problems (Adapted from [33]).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Schematic of some engineering problems [34].

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

IGD results.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

SP results of algorithms in the CEC 2009 test functions.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

MS results of algorithms in the CEC 2009 test functions.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 5.

CEC 2009 rounds for some algorithms, highlighting MOSRS (UF1:UF4).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

CEC 2009 rounds for some algorithms, highlighting MOSRS (UF5:UF8).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

CEC 2009 rounds for some algorithms, highlighting MOSRS (UF9-UF10).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Summarizing the IGD, SP, and MS results with a radar plot.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Friedman tests for the CEC 2009 problems.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Graphical assessment of competitive algorithms by IGD metric (UF1:UF6).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Graphical assessment of competitive algorithms by IGD metric (UF7:UF10).

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Graphical assessment of competitive algorithms by SP metric (UF1:UF6).

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Graphical assessment of competitive algorithms by SP metric (UF7:UF10).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Graphical assessment of competitive algorithms by MS metric (UF1:UF6).

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Graphical assessment of competitive algorithms by MS metric (UF7:UF10).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 8.

Mean HV.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 16.

All bi-objective mechanical design optimization problems studied.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Friedman test for the Engineering problems.

More »

Fig 17 Expand