Table 1.
Study sample’s details.
Fig 1.
Scree plot and the kaiser criterion (Eigenvalue >1), indicating a two-factor presentation.
Table 2.
Factor loadings after rotation.
Table 3.
Rotated Component Matrix.
Table 4.
Internal Consistency (Pearson).
Table 5.
The study tool’s reliability (questionnaire).
Table 6.
Degrees of approval.
Table 7.
Descriptive statistics of EFL teachers’ engagement in generative AI-mediated self-professionalism.
Table 8.
Descriptive statists of EFL teachers’ attitudes toward generative AI-mediated self-professionalism engagement.
Table 9.
Constraints to engaging in AI-mediated self-professionalism.
Table 10.
Solutions for Effective AI-Mediated Self-Professionalism.