Table 1.
Overview of the hypotheses for Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.
Table 2.
Face matching performance in the four experimental conditions in Experiment 1.
Table 3.
Face matching performance in the four experimental conditions in Experiment 2.
Fig 1.
Calibration curves for positive (“same person”, left panel) and negative (“different people”, right panel) decisions for each condition in Experiment 1.
The dotted line denotes perfect calibration. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals for the proportions.
Fig 2.
Confidence-based ROC curves for congruent and incongruent face sets (left) and for each experimental condition (right) for Experiment 1.
The left panel shows the ROC curves for congruent (full-full and masked-partial) pairs versus incongruent (full-partial and masked-full) pairs. The right panel shows the ROC curves separately for each experimental condition. Each point on the plot reflects the hit and false rate at each level of confidence. The diagonal line represents chance performance. The further points were away from the line of chance, the better the discriminability.
Fig 3.
Calibration curves for positive (“same person”, left panel) and negative (“different people”, right panel) decisions for each condition in Experiment 2.
The dotted line denotes perfect calibration. Error bars show 95% confidence intervals for the proportions.
Fig 4.
Confidence-based ROC curves for congruent and incongruent face sets (left) and for each experimental condition (right) for Experiment 2.
The left panel shows the ROC curves for congruent (full-full and masked-partial) pairs versus incongruent (full-partial and masked-full) pairs. The right panel shows the ROC curves separately for each experimental condition. Each point on the plot reflects the hit and false rate at each level of confidence. The diagonal line represents chance performance. The further points were away from the line of chance, the better the discriminability.