Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of the CoSC studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Research Methodology.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Steps of the combined FAHP-FTOPSIS calculations.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

The TpFNs and their linguistic expressions for the criteria weights.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The LVs and their related TPZ Fuzzy numbers used to evaluate alternatives.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Coffee supply chain flow chart.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Top coffee exporters countries to Jordanian market 2022.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Distribution functions that characterizes each kind of data for each supplier.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Coffee supply chain simualtion model.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The integration of the FMCDM and the simulation model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 6.

The average criteria weights.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

The coefficients of the criteria-weight.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Criterion weights.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

The final ranking of five suppliers.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Average performance measures for each supplier.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison between current-state and the two scenarios in regard to average lead time.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison between current-state and the two scenarios in regard to total shipping cost.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison between current-state and the two scenarios in regard to number of containers.

More »

Fig 8 Expand