Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Advantages and considerations of the proposed adaptive gain scheduled ISA-PI controller.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Overview of the adaptive gain scheduled ISA-PI control system.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Internal components of the adaptive gain ISA-PI control scheme.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Operational aspects of PWM generation in power transfer control.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Ideal model parameters derived from design requirements.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Overview of key components in the proposed DCBC design.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Circuit analysis of the DCBC in continuous conduction mode.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

The generic state space representation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

State-space average model and transfer function derivation of the DCBC.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

System configuration: prefilter, controller, and plant structure.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The independent impact of the set point and the assessment of the proposed control mechanism a) impact of set point weight on system response, b) comparison of single PI and ISA-PI control techniques at fixed set-point value of .

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The differential equations model of the DCBC for LPV approximation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Thorough visualization of linear system array with 10 distinct points withing the range of 20-40 Ω representing load variation a) frequency response, b) step response.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Effects of ±25% parameter variations on ISA-PI and single PI controllers: outcomes illustrating the impact of inductance, capacitance, and load resistance variations on a) single PI controller and b) the ISA-PI controller.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Comparative analysis of control strategies under noise and disturbance: evaluation of the proposed controller against four alternative strategies in the presence of intrinsic system variances.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Output voltage response to input voltage variations using gain scheduled PI and gain scheduled adaptive ISA-PI Controllers.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Experimental setup for assessing the proposed approach.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Test bench configuration of the custom-designed boost converter.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Open-loop system response at 20 kHz switching frequency a) 0.3 duty cycle, b) duty cycle change from 0.3 to 0.5.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Transient response of proposed DCBC under various control strategies a) single PI, b) cascade PI, c) ISA-PI with constant set-point weight, d) adaptive gain scheduled ISA-PI.

More »

Fig 15 Expand