Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and correlation matrix of study variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Model fit indices for two to five segment solutions for eco-emotions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Eco-emotion segmentation solution.

Notes. Participants were asked to rate how environmental problems made them feel. N = 286. Emotionally-detached, n = 114. Emotionally-ambivalent, n = 97. Empathic-alarmed, n = 75. Scores were centered and ranged from −2 (strongly disagree) to +2 (strongly agree).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Mean scores, standard deviations, and mean differences for individual eco-emotions across the three eco-emotion segments.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Demographic characteristics of the three eco-emotion segments.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Mean scores for environmental concern and willingness to sacrifice across the three eco-emotion segments.

Notes. N = 286. Emotionally-detached, n = 114. Emotionally-ambivalent, n = 97. Empathic-alarmed, n = 75. Error bars represent 95% confidence interval. Environmental concern was measured with seven items on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Willingness to sacrifice was measured with 24 items, all measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).

More »

Fig 2 Expand