Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

(a) The overall architecture of our proposed SA-UMamba. (b) RSSS block is the main construction block of SA-UMamba, integrating the VSSM and RFAC modules for enhanced feature extraction. (c) VSSM is the crucial module in the Mamba model for extracting visual features, with SS2D as its core operation.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

SS2D module.

(a) SS2D expansion operation; (b) Core component of Mamba (S6); (c) SS2D merging operation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

RFAC module, which dynamically determines the importance of each feature in the receptive field.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Segmentation results for various methods conducted on Synapse dataset. (The best results are highlighted in bold, and the second best are underlined.)

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Visualization of segmentation results for different methods on the Synapse dataset.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Segmentation results for various methods conducted on ISIC17 and ISIC18 datasets. (The best results are highlighted in bold, and the second best are underlined.)

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Segmentation results for CVC-ClinicDB dataset. (The best results are highlighted in bold, and the second best are underlined.)

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Synapse dataset segmentation results for differently scaled pre-trained weights with the same backbone. (The best results are highlighted in bold.)

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Synapse dataset segmentation results for different RSSS block design choices. (The best results are highlighted in bold.)

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Segmentation results for different attention calculation methods on the Synapse dataset. (The best results are highlighted in bold.)

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Ablation study on the number of RSSS blocks in encoder and decoder. (The best results are highlighted in bold.)

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison of model Params(M), FLOPs(G). These test results were obtained on a single RTX3090. (The best results are highlighted in bold.)

More »

Table 8 Expand