Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparative overview of LiDAR-based UAV detection technologies and approaches.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

General system overview.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Proposed system radar architecture.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The LiDAR system alternatives.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Transmit-receive system.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Longitudinal section of the radar showing key parameters r, h, and L.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

LiDAR design for the multi-array static alternative.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of static multi-array LiDAR and one-array rotating LiDAR systems.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Simulation parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Detection failure vs. element spacing for static and turning lidars.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Detection delay vs. element spacing for static and turning lidars.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Impact of sensor spacing on the detection efficiency.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Received power vs. atmospheric attenuation and field of view.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Received power vs. surveillance range.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Detection efficiency vs. inter-array angle for static lidar.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Detection efficiency vs. surveillance zone radius for static and turning lidar.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Detection efficiency vs one turn duration.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Analysis of beam divergences effects.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Coverage area vs. beam divergence.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Environmental conditions effect on the detection efficiency.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Impact of UAV altitude on the detection efficiency.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Impact of UAV speeds on the detection efficiency.

More »

Fig 19 Expand