Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The obtained flow chart for formulation preparation of turkey burger samples.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

The component results of amino acid profiles in quinoa, chia, soy, amaranth and pea protein concentrates.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The high-performance liquid chromatography in quinoa, chia, soy, amaranth, and pea protein concentrates.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Taguchi design and response variables related to the chemical characteristics, water and oil holding capacities, emulsion stability and activity with cooking loss of quinoa, chia, soybean, amaranth, and pea protein concentrates.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The obtained diagrams of the Taguchi scheme design in quinoa, soybean, and amaranth protein concentrates.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Central composite design of texture responses (Hardness, cohesiveness, elasticity, gumminess, chewiness and adhesiveness) based on independent variables.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The statistical results using ANOVA for textural and total acceptability confirmed models in burger analysis of turkey meat products.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Three-dimensional (3D) response surface plots indicating the significant (p < 0.05) interaction effect of factors (A: Quinoa, B: Soybean, C: Amaranth at 0 to 25% concentrations) on the burger.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Central composite design of texture and total acceptability responses based on independent variables.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

The microstructure characterization of control and optimal samples in turkey meat burgers.

More »

Fig 5 Expand