Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of related studies on EV driving experience and acceleration preference.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Longitudinal acceleration characteristics of each designed profile (A–E) for Experiment 1 [35].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Longitudinal acceleration characteristics of each designed profile (A–E) for Experiment 2 [35].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic and professional backgrounds of the participants.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Interior view of the test vehicle during the evaluation of acceleration profiles.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Bradley-Terry model estimates for the group of ICEV experts in Experiment 1.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Bradley-Terry model estimates for the group of EV experts in Experiment 1.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Centered estimates for the five acceleration profiles in Experiment 1.

(a) Group of ICEV experts; (b) group of EV experts.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Scatter plots illustrating the relationships between dynamic characteristics of acceleration profiles and centered estimates of subjective preferences in Experiment 1.

Subfigures show: (a) maximum jerk; (b) time to maximum jerk; (c) acceleration gradient; (d) kurtosis of jerk. Data points are distinguished by ICEV experts (Group A) and EV experts (Group B).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Bradley-Terry model estimates for the group of ICEV experts in Experiment 2.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Bradley-Terry model estimates for the group of EV experts in Experiment 2.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

Centered estimates for the five acceleration profiles in Experiment 2.

(a) Group of ICEV experts; (b) group of EV experts.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Scatter plots illustrating the relationships between dynamic characteristics of acceleration profiles and centered estimates of subjective preferences in Experiment 2.

Subfigures show: (a) maximum jerk; (b) time to maximum jerk; (c) acceleration gradient; (d) kurtosis of jerk. Data points are distinguished by ICEV experts (Group A) and EV experts (Group B).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 7.

Pearson correlation coefficients between centered estimates and dynamic profile characteristics.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Pearson correlation coefficients for dynamic characteristics of acceleration profiles in Experiments 1 and 2.

(a) ICEV and EV expert groups under the light tip-in condition (Experiment 1); (b) ICEV and EV expert groups under the middle tip-in condition (Experiment 2). Dynamic characteristics include maximum jerk, time to maximum jerk, acceleration gradient, and jerk kurtosis.

More »

Fig 8 Expand