Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of data matching between study cohorts based on baseline characteristics using propensity score matching and unsupervised machine learning methods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Baseline characteristics of recipients’ comparison before and after data match by the unsupervised machine learning algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Kidney transplant recipients’ and donors’ demographic characteristics comparison between KDPI 98-100% vs. KDPI 85-97% cohorts.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

5-year allograft and patient survival rate comparison between the KDPI 98–100% and KDPI 85–97% cohorts.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

The five-year allograft survival comparison between the KDPI 98-100% and KDPI 85-97% cohorts considering different factors.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

5-year allograft survival rate comparison, stratified by the history of maintenance dialysis between the KDPI 98–100% and KDPI 85–97% cohorts.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

5-year allograft survival rate comparison, stratified by DGF and DCD between the KDPI 98–100% and KDPI 85–97% cohorts.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

5-year allograft survival rate comparison, stratified by ethnicity between the KDPI 98–100% and KDPI 85–97% cohorts.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

5-year allograft survival rate comparison, stratified by the recipients’ age between the KDPI 98–100% and KDPI 85–97% cohorts.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

The etiology of allograft failure and comparison between the KDPI 98-100% and KDPI 85-97% cohorts.

More »

Table 4 Expand