Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Forage yield of different cultivated grasslands.

Note: Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences in forage yield among grasslands across different planting years (P < 0.05). (A) illustrates the forage yield of Poa + Elymus mixtures, Poa monoculture, and Elymus monoculture. (B) shows the forage yield of Poa + Festuca mixtures, Poa monoculture, and Festuca monoculture. (C) presents the forage yield of Poa + Puccinellia mixtures, Poa monoculture, and Puccinellia monoculture. (D) depicts the yield stability of different grasslands.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Stem/leaf ratio, digestible dry matter, dry matter intake and relative feed value of different cultivated grasslands.

Note: Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different years within the same cultivated grassland (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different cultivated grasslands within the same year (P < 0.05).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Crude protein, crude fiber, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber of different cultivated grasslands.

Note: Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences among different years within the same cultivated grassland (P < 0.05). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different cultivated grasslands within the same year (P < 0.05).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Interspecific relationships in different mixed grasslands.

Note: (A) illustrates the relative yields of different mixed cultivated grasslands. (B) depicts the relative total yields of different mixed cultivated grasslands. “*” indicates a significant difference in RYT from 1 (P < 0.05).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

LASSO regression analysis and model evaluation of production performance in cultivated grasslands under mixed-sown and monoculture treatments.

(A) LASSO Regression Model Convergence Results. (B) LASSO Regression Output. (C) ROC Model Prediction.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Weighting of cultivated grassland production performance indicators using the CRITIC method.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 6.

Comprehensive evaluation of cultivated grassland production performance.

More »

Fig 6 Expand