Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Comparison of axial length (A) and spherical equivalent (B) in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

The mean axial length was longer in MPH, ERM-FS, and LMH compared to ERM. The spherical equivalent was significantly smaller in the MPH, ERM-FS, and LMH compared to the ERM. Significantly different in Tukey-Kramer test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after surgery in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH). a: Significantly different in the Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. b: Significantly different in the Tukey-Kramer test.

Preoperative BCVA did not significantly differ among the groups. Postoperative BCVA was significantly worse in LMH compared to ERM.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

OCT findings of epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of central foveal thickness (CFT) (A), central retinal thickness (CRT) (B), and macular volume (MV) (C) in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH) Both the CFT and CRT were significantly higher in the ERM compared to the other three groups.

Additionally, the ERM-FS showed significantly higher CFT and CRT compared to the LMH. The MV was significantly larger in ERM compared to the LMH. Significantly different from the other groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, Tukey-Kramer test).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Relationships between preoperative OCT findings and visual acuity in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Multiple regression analysis between postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and preoperative BCVA and OCT findings in epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular pseudohole (MPH), ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).

More »

Table 4 Expand