Fig 1.
The workflow of this study.
Fig 2.
Flow chart of patient enrollment in this study.
Table 1.
Comparison of performance of each model in different subgroups.
Fig 3.
ROC curves and AUC values of each model in different subgroups, where (A-D) represent the lesion ADC group, lesion T2 group, lesion ADC+T2 group, and lesion combined with peritumoral ADC+T2 group, respectively.
Fig 4.
Calibration curves of each model in different subgroups, where (A-D) represent the lesion ADC group, lesion T2 group, lesion ADC+T2 group, and lesion combined with peritumoral ADC+T2 group, respectively.
Fig 5.
SHAP analysis visualization of the model, where (A-D) represent the lesion ADC group, lesion T2 group, lesion ADC+T2 group, and lesion combined with peritumoral
ADC+T2 group, respectively.