Fig 1.
Location of the investigated reservoirs in Paraíba and the location of the residence visited where the interviews took place, Brazil.
Author: Lucianna Marques Rocha Ferreira. References used in the cartographic base: [19,20].
Fig 2.
Scheme for obtaining and processing primary data.
Figure created by the author: Lucianna Marques Rocha Ferreira, using Canva Pro (www.canva.com).
Fig 3.
EGS classes recorded in the reservoir landscapes that receive and do not receive IBWT from the São Francisco River, Paraíba, Brazil. Where: ‘N’ corresponds to the number of citations per EGS classes.
Fig 4.
Thematic map illustrating LULC alongside the number of EGSs classes for reservoirs receiving IBWT (A = Argemiro de Figueiredo; B = Epitácio Pessoa; C = Camalaú; and D = Poções) and those that do not (E = Araçagi; F = Cordeiro; G = Sumé; and H = Taperoá) in Brazil.
Author: Lucianna Marques Rocha Ferreira. The maps labeled A1, B1, C1, D1, E1, F1, G1, and H1 depict the LULC types, while the maps labeled A2, B2, C2, D2, E2, F2, G2, and H2 represent the corresponding number of EGSs classes identified in each reservoir landscape.
Table 1.
Results of the PERMANOVA statistical test for interaction between IBWT variables, number of EGSs per section, and SDGs.
Fig 5.
Links between the number of EGSs recognized by respondents residing close to the reservoirs that do and do not receive IBWT, categorized by EGS sections (provisioning, regulation and maintenance, and cultural), and their relationship with SDGs. Where: ‘NC’ corresponds to the number of connections between EGSs and SDGs.