Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Definition of OCT measurement.

a) Macular radial scan, b) Retinal layers used in the OCT measurement: Nerve fiber layer (NFL) thickness from the internal limiting membrane (ILM) to the NFL; Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness from the ganglion cell layer (GCL) to the inner plexiform layer (IPL); Outer nuclear layer (ONL) to Bruch’s membrane (BM) thickness; Fovea; Choroid. The average macular thickness was then defined as IML to BM c) Diagram of the nine ETDRS subfields.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Average axial length, spherical equivalent, refraction, and body height of the included participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of the mean retinal thickness values per layer and the mean choroidal thickness.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of the mean retinal thickness values per layer and per quadrant.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Correlation between retinal layer thickness and AL.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Correlation between retinal layer thickness and the SE.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlations between retinal layer thickness and AL and SE.

Correlation coefficient (r) and p value (P) of Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. The quadrants are the temporal (T), superior (S), nasal (N), and inferior (I) subfields. a) average macular thickness vs. AL, b) average macular thickness vs. SE, c) ONL to BM vs. AL, d) ONL to BM vs. SE, e) GC-IPL vs. AL, f) GC-IPL vs. SE, g) NFL vs. AL, h) NFL vs. AL.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Multivariable regression analysis of the relationships between retinal and choroidal thickness and axial length, sex, and body height.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of the average macular thickness per sector in the present study with previous reports.

More »

Table 7 Expand