Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

The curated data from the Twitter Dataset.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Conventional (Traditional) Machine Learning model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Proposed model architecture Augment Machine learning model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Augmented Ensemble Model (AEM).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Health Term Text Data Augmentation (HTTDA) transformation for reduction to n-Classes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Health Terms Text Data Augmentation with the augmentation technique of “word substitution”.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The PCA Health Terms Scatter plot of the devised model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The Disease Text class distribution before applying the HTTDA word vector.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The disease text class distribution after the application of text data augmentation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Accuracy of the classifiers using machine learning pipeline.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The F1 macro, weighted, and micro scores for various classifiers and a voting ensemble.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 8.

A comparative plot of the results of the performance of the classifiers for respective F1 scores (macro, weighted, and micro).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The plot of location-wise unique health terms per tweet over time.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison with existing models.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 10.

Country-wise aggregation of health terms from the tweet corpus.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparative study of Accuracy as performance parameter.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Illustrative Group Class to Class mapping for the Group Class “flu”.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Illustrative Group Class to Class mapping for the Group Class “cancer”.

More »

Fig 13 Expand