Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig. 1.

The procedure of acquiring breast thermograms [12].

More »

Fig. 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of the presented approach.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Breast theromographic images:

(a, b): Healthy, (c, d): Sick [13,32].

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig. 4.

Results of pseudo-coloring algorithms for a normal thermogram of an individual: original gray-level image, and its pseudo-colorized images in the HSI color space under various conditions.

More »

Fig. 4 Expand

Fig. 5.

Breast thermograms clustering using FCM method.

(a) Pseudo-colorized image, (b) clustered image applying the FCM method, (c) extracted hottest region after removing the axilla and sternal and the final binary image.

More »

Fig. 5 Expand

Table 1.

The mean std. of chaotic features for all benign and malignant cases.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The mean std. of texture features of benign and malignant cases for all breast thermograms.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The design parameters for feature selection methods.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The final values of the cost function, the selected features number, and the implementation time for the introduced meta-heuristic algorithms.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig. 6.

The objective function amounts versus the selected feature number for the NSGA III method.

More »

Fig. 6 Expand

Table 5.

Further information regarding the designed classifiers.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The achieved outcomes regarding the statistical metrics of the designed classifiers.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig. 7.

The bar graph depicting the statistical metrics of the designed classifiers applying 10-fold cross-validation method.

More »

Fig. 7 Expand

Table 7.

Accuracy related to different feature domains on different classifications.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig. 8.

The graph bar of the accuracy comparison for three types of feature sets applying 10-fold cross-validation method.

More »

Fig. 8 Expand

Table 8.

A comparison between accuracies of the present method and the other published results used the same database (DMR-IR).

More »

Table 8 Expand