Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The schematic of the mechanism of action.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Raw coal gangue and coal gangue aggregates.

(a) Raw coal gangue. (b) Coal gangue aggregates.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Coal gangue concrete specimens.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Test results of GFRP confined concrete specimens.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

GFRP confined concrete specimens.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Linear contact model.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Parallel bonding model.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Principle of FLAC-PFC coupling calculation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

FRP sheets wrapped specimen.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Mechanical model of geogrid element.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Comparison of experimental and simulation results of GFRP confined specimens.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 2.

Relative error between test and simulation results for GFRP confined specimens.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mesoscopic parameters of PFC3D-FLAC3D coupling model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Numerical simulation scheme.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 11.

Stress-strain curves of FRP confined specimens.

(a) GFRP confined specimens. (b) CFRP confined specimens. (c) BFRP confined specimen.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Enhancement of stress and strain for FRP confined specimens.

(a) Stress. (b) Strain.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Compressive strength of FRP confined CGC.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Elastic modulus of FRP confined CGC.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The number of strong contact and strong contact force of GFRP confined concrete specimens under three coal gangue replacement rates (0%, 50%, 100%).

(a) Strong contact number. (b) Strong contact force.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

The number of strong contact and strong contact force of CFRP confined concrete specimens under three coal gangue replacement rates (0%, 50%, 100%).

(a) Strong contact number. (b) Strong contact force.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

The number of strong contact and strong contact force of BFRP confined concrete specimens under three coal gangue replacement rates (0%, 50%, 100%).

(a) Strong contact number. (b) Strong contact force.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

The maximum values of strong contact force and strong contact number for FRP confined CGC.

(a) Strong contact force. (b) Strong contact number.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Crack propagation characteristics in the failure of GFRP confined coal gangue concrete.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Crack propagation characteristics in the failure of CFRP confined coal gangue concrete.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Crack propagation characteristics in the failure of BFRP confined coal gangue concrete.

More »

Fig 21 Expand