Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Growth rate comparison of the probiotic and control samples.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Plant growth process from day 1 to 6. a: day 1 (24 hours after sowing).

Seed germination. The average height of bifidobacterium – containing plant and the control one was respectively, 0.53 cm and 0.52 cm. b: day 2. The above vases show the bifidobacterium – containig plants and the below ones show the control plants. The average height of probiotic and the control plant on this day was 1.1 cm 0.9 cm respectively. c: day 3. Probiotic plant (2.6 cm), control plant (2.5 cm). d: day 4. Probiotic plant (3.48 cm), control plant (3.46 cm). e: day 5. Probiotc plant (4.4 cm), control plant (4.38 cm). f: day 6. Probiotic plant (4.73 cm), control plant (4.7 cm).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Changes in the number of Bifidobacteria from days 0 to 3.

A decrease in the bacterial cells number is observed but the product maintained its probiotic properties.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

pH values of two samples at minutes 1 () and 2 ().

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The acidity difference of two samples; The samples containing bacteria represents higher acidity.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Changes in fat content of two samples.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Vitamin C content of the probiotic and the control samples.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Sensory evaluation results as an average of fifteen determinations.

More »

Fig 8 Expand