Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Testing capacity multipliers with group testing.

Notes: Median and 95% confidence interval of the testing capacity multiplier obtained with group testing in case the actual (ex-post) fraction of positives to tests is different from the forecasted fraction of positives to tests used to set the group size according to Dorfman [17].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Calibration.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Loss functions, .

Notes: Loss functions (see equation 20) in units of total GDP per capita as a function of the test cost. Testing capacity equal to 5% and weight to the monetized value of deaths equal to 0.5. Solid lines: no group testing. Dotted lines: group testing. Triangles: contact tracing. Squares: random screenings. Circles: voluntary tests. The parameters used for the simulation are summarized in table 1. Optimal random screening strategy entails .

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Contact Tracing and Group Testing.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Contact tracing and group testing during an epidemic.

Notes: Empirical distributions of the peak in new hospitalizations (upper-left panel), mortality (upper-right panel), median percentage of discovered infected (lower-left panel) and output gap (lower-right panel) over simulation runs. Solid line: tests to hospitalized agents only; Solid-dashed line: contact tracing; Solid line with asterisks: contact tracing with group testing. The parameters used for the simulation are summarized in table 1.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Contact Tracing with Group Testing, Robustness.

More »

Table 3 Expand