Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

CONSORT flow diagram of participant enrollment and retention.

CONSORT flow diagram detailing participant enrollment, allocation, intervention, follow-up, and analysis. A total of 42 participants were assessed for eligibility, with 18 meeting the inclusion criteria and completing the study. The diagram illustrates the process from initial assessment through to the final analysis, including reasons for exclusion and participant retention throughout the study phases.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Experimental procedure timeline and sequence of visits for dual-task training.

Schematics of the study protocol. The experimental design includes pre-training, post-training, and follow-up assessments of dual-task (DT) performance, single-task cognitive performance (measured as reaction time, RT), and single-task motor performance (measured as balance time in seconds). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was utilized to measure cortical activation in the bilateral prefrontal and vestibular cortices. The DT training protocol involved the simultaneous execution of cognitive tasks (simple and complex auditory RT) and motor tasks (balance) for 20–25 minutes per day across five consecutive days. Participants completed 18 DT trials each day, with each trial consisting of 30 seconds of task performance followed by 30 seconds of rest.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

fNIRS source-detector array setup. Red Indicates Source; Yellow Indicates Detector.

This figure illustrates the arrangement of the functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) system utilized in the study. The setup features multiple source-detector pairs, with sources indicated in red and detectors in yellow. The sources emit near-infrared light that penetrates the cortical tissues, while the detectors capture the transmitted light to assess changes in cortical oxygenation. The strategic placement and configuration of these components are essential for accurately monitoring cortical activation in the PFC and vestibular cortices during cognitive, motor, and DT conditions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Study Block Design: Task Structure and Trial Distribution.

A: 30 seconds rest; B1: auditory RT (cognitive) task (simple RT or complex RT tasks); B2: balance (motor) task; B3: auditory cognitive task + balance tasks (DT). Each participant preformed six trials with three simple RT trials and three complex RT tasks.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Post-hoc analysis for visit-wise differences in dual-task learning. Significant differences between visits are indicated with an asterisk (*).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Dual-task learning across training visits for simple and complex reaction times.

Dual-task (DT) performance during SRT and CRT across five training visits. Participants were required to maintain the stability platform within 3 degrees of horizontal while simultaneously responding to SRT and CRT. DT performance, indicated by the average number of seconds in balance during 30-second trials, progressively improved over the course of the five training visits (Visits 2–6) for both cognitive conditions. Data points represent the mean performance across 18 trials, and error bars denote the 95% confidence interval.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Dual-task (DT) performance during simple and complex cognitive conditions.

DT performance during pre-, post, and follow-up training visits. DT performance improved and retained with training. The bars denote the mean and error bars denotes standard deviation.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Median reaction time (RT) across pre-, post-, and follow-up testing for simple and complex conditions.

RT decreased and retained with training for simple as well as complex cognitive conditions, which indicates faster information processing time.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Motor performance across pre-, post-, and follow-up testing for simple and complex cognitive conditions.

Balance time increased and retained with training.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

A) Prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation during simple reaction time task (SRT); B) Vestibular cortex (VEST) activation during SRT; C) PFC activation during complex reaction time (CRT); D) VEST activation during CRT; E) PFC activation during balance task; F) VEST activation during balance task; G) PFC activation during SRT dual-task; H) VEST activation during SRT dual-task; I) PFC activation during CRT dual-task; J) VEST activation during CRT dual-task; * FDRp < 0.001.

More »

Fig 9 Expand