Fig 1.
Consort-like Figure Showing the Flow of Participants from the Menstruation and Ovulation Study 2 who volunteered for the QTc Sub-study and those with eligible Paired Follicular and Luteal or Anovulatory Premenstrual information.
Table 1.
Comparison of Demographic, Anthropomorphic, & Reproductive Variables between Cardiac Sub-study & MOS2 only Participants during SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.
Table 2.
Characteristics of Participants in this QTc Sub-Study of Menstruation and Ovulation Study 2 (MOS2) during the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic in all with Paired Follicular-Luteal Data (ovulatory), and those with Paired Follicular-Premenstrual (anovulatory) Cycle Data.
Table 3.
Follicular & Luteal (or Premenstrual) Phase Electrocardiographic Parameters and QTc of Women by Menstrual Cycle Phase within Ovulation Categories in QTc Sub-study of the MOS2 during the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic.
Fig 2.
Timing of QTc Measurements in the Luteal Phase of Ovulatory Cycles.
Distribution of QTc Measurement Timing Within the Luteal Phase in Ovulatory Cycles by Quantitative Basal Temperature© Analysis in the MOS2 QTc Sub-Study.
Table 4.
QTc Comparison Within Ovulatory and Anovulatory Women during different menstrual cycle phases in the QTc Sub-study of the MOS2 during the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic.
Fig 3.
Meta-Analysis Forest Plot of QTc Difference in Ovulatory Cycles.
This Random‐Effects Forest Plot Compared the Weighted Mean Difference in QTc (msec) of Follicular versus Luteal Phases in Proven Ovulatory Menstrual Cycles. The QT interval was rate-corrected using Fridericia’s Formula.