Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The theoretical model is based on Wilson and Cleary’s model.

①: Hypothesis 1 of the current study; ②: Hypothesis 2 of the current study; ③: Hypothesis 3 of the current study. BSE: Balance Self-Efficacy; HRQL: Health-Related Quality of Life; QoL: Quality of Life. The arrows represent the hypothesized directional relationships between the variables in the model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical information.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Correlations among variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Path analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Model fit (χ2 = 14.233,χ2/df = 4.744, p = 0.002. RMSEA = 0.075, SRMR = 0.010, TLI = 0.981, CFI = 0.994).

Mini-BEST: mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test; BRS: Brunnstrom; BSE: Balance self-efficacy; QoL: Quality of Life. This model is consistent with hypotheses 1 and 2 of the theoretical model. BSE and Depressive symptoms are mediating variables between Physical capability and QoL.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

The total, direct, and indirect effects.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Moderated analysis.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Interactive effect of hypertension on the relationship between physical capability, QoL, and depressive symptoms.

This is consistent with the assumptions of Theoretical Model 3. Hypertension acts as a moderating variable between Physical capability and QoL.

More »

Fig 3 Expand