Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Input data information for each particular step.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

The mental fatigue detection framework.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

68 special landmarks from face image.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The pseudocode of the RFE algorithm.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The DRN-RF model.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The structure of residual block.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

The steps of applying RF algorithm.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

The workflow of the RF algorithm (the size of the training sampleS is N; the sample has M features and the forest has k trees).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

The original Karolinska Sleepiness Scale.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The modified KSS and experiment sample size.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

The overall workflow of the experiment.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 5.

Cross- validation result in threshold selection.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

MFD related features selected by using RFECV. (the ‘~’ represents that all features in the interval are retained; x represents horizontal coordinate, y presents vertical coordinate).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 8.

A total of 83 selected features.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 7.

Parameters of GBM.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Parameters of KNN.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Parameters of RF.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

The test results of different MFD comparison.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Comparison of difference between DRN-RF and the others.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

The test results of different MFD comparison in Sleepy & Extremely Sleepy.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Comparison of difference between DRN-RF and the others in Sleepy & Extremely Sleepy.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

The performance of different MFD models comparison in Sleepy & Extremely Sleepy.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Fig 9.

The confusion matrices of different MFD models comparison.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Characteristic correlation thermal diagram.

(Feature correlation coefficients among three classes, including eye features, nose features, and mouth features. Red color represents strong correlation, and blue color represents poor correlation).

More »

Fig 10 Expand