Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study Methodology.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline demographics of survey responders (n = 562).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Interest and current use by medical specialty.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Physician interest in LLM-based virtual assistants (n = 562).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Physician interest levels and applications of LLM-based virtual assistants.

Interest was expressed for all listed purposes, with highest levels for journal review, patient education, and documentation/dictation. Among the physicians currently using LLM assistants (n = 118), the most frequently used applications were medical information and education, study/research design, and documentation/dictation. *Interest levels were obtained from the entire study cohort (n = 562).

**Current use rates were obtained from a sub-cohort of physicians who endorsed currently using LLM-based virtual assistants, and multiple applications could be endorsed by the same physician (n = 118).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Characteristics of physicians currently using LLM-based virtual assistants (n = 118).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Inferential statistics by gender, role, and age bracket.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Physician Interest Rates by Gender and Role.

Males were less likely to show interest for the following domains: study/research design (p = 0.011), journal review (p = 0.015), patient education (p < 0.001), and exam preparation (p < 0.001). More trainees were very interested for the following uses: medical information and education (p = 0.021), documentation/dictation (p = -0.022), study/research design (p = 0.002), journal review (p = 0.002), and exam preparation (p < 0.001).

More »

Fig 3 Expand