Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics about survey participants in each survey who provided responses identified as copied, or not identified as copied and the total number of responses and frequencies for each demographic, including Generation, Gender and Education.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Standardized indicator reliability estimates for Study 1, Survey 1, 2 and 3 respectively (S1–S3). Estimates are shown for each indicator for each of four constructs examined (Acceptance, Benefit, Risk, Social Trust), and for participants who provided responses identified as copied and those whose responses were not identified as copied. All indicator reliability estimates are significant (p < 0.001).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Standardized indicator reliability estimates for Study 2, Survey 4. Estimates are shown for each indicator for each of five constructs examined (Attitude, Benefit, Risk, Social Trust, ATN), and for participants who provided responses identified as copied and those whose responses were not identified as copied. All indicator reliability estimates are significant (p < 0.001).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Cronbach’s alpha and 99% confidence intervals for Study 1, Surveys 1, 2 and 3. Values and confidence intervals are shown separately for each of four constructs examined (Acceptance, Benefit, Risk and Social Trust), and for participants who provided responses identified as copied and those whose responses were not identified as copied. For each of the constructs Cronbach’s alpha was significantly higher (p < 0.01) for participants who provided the more original responses, with the exception of the Social Trust construct for Surveys 2 and 3.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Cronbach’s alpha and 99% confidence intervals for Study 2, Survey 4. Values and confidence intervals are shown separately for each of five constructs examined (Attitude, Benefit, Risk, Social Trust, and ATN), and for participants who provided responses identified as copied and those whose responses were not identified as copied. The indicator AT2 was removed due to poor correlation with the ATN construct. For each of the constructs Cronbach’s alpha was significantly higher (p < 0.01) for participants who provided the more original responses.

More »

Table 5 Expand