Fig 1.
Created using public data from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/.
Fig 3.
Workflow of COP30DEM deviation correction model.
Fig 4.
Prediction results of different models.
Fig 5.
Histogram comparing DMFDEM, FABDEM, EU DEM against the validation data.
Fig 6.
DEM in California (a) DMFDEM; (b) LiDAR DEM; (c) FABDEM.
Fig 7.
(a) DMFDEM in Kalimantan; (b) FABDEM in Kalimantan; (c) DMFDEM in Florida; (d) FABDEM in Florida; (e) DMFDEM in Pärnumaa; (f) FABDEM in Pärnumaa.
Fig 8.
Transect in parts of California.