Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Immunohistochemical test images (×200).

A: ER+; B:ER-; C: PR+; D:PR-; E: HER2+; F: HER2-; G: Ki67 high; H: Ki67 low; I: AR+; J: AR-; K: P53+; L: P53-.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Histopathologic analysis for tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density was performed on a single full-face hematoxylin and eosin-stained tumor section.

A: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density is less than 10% (TILs < 10%) (Tumour percentage is 85%, and the TILs score is 1%) (H&E × 200). B: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density is greater than or equal to 10% and less than 50% (10% ≤ TILs < 50%) (Tumour percentage is 60%, and TILs score is 30%) (H&E × 200). C: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density is greater than or equal to 50% (TILs ≥ 50%) (Tumour percentage is 35%, and TILs score is 70%) (H&E × 200).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Patients’ baseline characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The relationship between sentinel lymph node metastasis and clinical pathological features in patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Patients’ TILs and the relationship with clinical and pathological features.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Dividing the density of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) at a threshold of 50% to categorize into lymphocyte predominant breast cancer (LPBC) and non-lymphocyte predominant breast cancer (nLPBC), patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) have a higher proportion of LPBC, followed by those with HER2-enriched breast cancer.

Patients with Luminal A (LA) and Luminal B (LB) breast cancer have the smallest proportion of LPBC (P < 0.001) (A). When dividing the density of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) with a cutoff of 10% into high TILs and low TILs, there is no significant difference in TILs among Luminal A (LA), Luminal B (LB), HER2-overexpressing, and Triple-Negative (TN) breast cancer types (P = 0.902) (B).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of sentinel lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer patients.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of sentinel lymph node metastasis in early triple-negative, Luminal A, and Luminal B breast cancer patients.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Based on the multivariate analysis, a forest plot was constructed, showing that clinical T stage (P = 0.002, OR = 0.464) and the level of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs) (P < 0.001, OR = 4.549) are independent predictive factors for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis (SLNM).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Using t-tests and box plots to analyze the correlation between TILs (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes) density and SLNM (Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis), it was found that in all patients, those with SLNM had a significantly lower TILs density than those without SLN metastasis (P = 0.001).

(A). When analyzing each subtype, only Luminal B (LB) breast cancer (P = 0.014) and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) (P < 0.001) showed statistical differences (C, E), while other subtypes did not exhibit significant differences (B, D).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Using the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve to evaluate the value of TILs (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes) density in predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis (SLNM) in early-stage (cT1-2N0) breast cancer, the AUC (Area Under the Curve) was 0.624 (CI: 0.559-0.689), with a sensitivity of 0.440 and a specificity of 0.783.

The optimal cutoff value was 17.5%, indicating good predictive performance.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Based on the results of multivariate regression analysis, a nomogram model for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis (SLNM) was constructed using the R programming language.

More »

Fig 7 Expand