Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

High-speed airflow field test.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The noise test.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Noise data inside vehicle.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Noise at the key frequencies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Results of autocorrelation analysis.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Sound field test (a) the model; (b) the test result of XOZ plane inside vehicle; (c) the S0 region.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The sound field test of the TWMP in region S0.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Vibration and noise test.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Booming noise data of TWMP.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The vibration test data of TSWM.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

The modal of TWMP.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

The modal of acoustic cavity.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Deformation test of TWMP.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The deformation data of TWMP.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

The time domain data of deformation in region S2.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

CFD simulation results.

(a) The flow field (b) The normal force in region S0.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Damping plate.

(a) Attachment position (b) Equivalent model of damping plate.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 2.

Parameters of damping plate specimen.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 17.

Finite element model of TWMP.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Dynamic model of TWMP.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Vibration comparison data in the time domain.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Vibration comparison data in the frequency domain.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

The maximum deformation of TWMP with different n.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Simulation comparison results.

(a) The time domain curve. (b) The frequency domain curve.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Test comparison results.

(a) The test photograph. (b) The deformed data. (c) The sound field data.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Comparison results of vibration test data.

(a) The time domain data. (b) The frequency domain data.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Noise comparison results near the driver’s ear.

(a) Noise data under uniform acceleration conditions. (b) Noise data at 120 m/h.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Noise comparison results near the passenger’s ear.

(a) Noise data under uniform acceleration conditions. (b) Noise data at 120 kmh.

More »

Fig 26 Expand