Table 1.
Demographic description of nationwide sample.
Table 2.
Sample size, evolution knowledge, and evolution acceptance between agnostic, atheist, and different religiously affiliated respondents.
Fig 1.
Evolution acceptance compared between agnostic/atheist and religious individuals.
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 2.
Structural equation models showing the relationship between knowledge and acceptance for agnostic/atheistic respondents.
Numbers represent standardized loading factors. ** indicates significance of p < .001.
Fig 3.
Structural equation models showing the relationship between knowledge and acceptance for judeo-christian respondents.
Numbers represent standardized loading factors. ** indicates significance of p < .001.
Fig 4.
Shift in Likert-scale responses to EALS items.
The darker the bars, the more respondents agreed with the statements. Students in the control group are the top bars; students in the treatment condition are the bottom bars.