Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

A schematic of the experimental process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Chemical composition of OPC and GGBFS.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Particle size distribution of natural sand.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Mix proportions and the required mortar quantity by weight.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Curing of samples until 365 days at 23±3°C.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Flowability of cementitious mortar.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Fresh density of a cementitious mortar without SP.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Fresh density of cementitious mortar with 1% SP.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Fresh density of cementitious mortar with 2% SP.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Bulk density at 0.4 w/b.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Bulk density at 0.44 w/b.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Bulk density at 0.48 w/b.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

(a). Long-term compressive strength development of fully cement. (b). Long-term compressive strength development of 22.5% GGBFS blended cement. (c). Long-term compressive strength development of 45% GGBFS blended cement.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 3.

The Results of long-term, temp cycles of compressive strength and water absorption including different mixtures.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 12.

(a). Compressive strength of fully cement under heating and cooling procedure. (b). Compressive strength of cement modified of 22.5% GGBS under heating and cooling procedure. (c). Compressive strength of cement was modified by about 45% based evaluated under heating and cooling procedure.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

(a). Weight loss percentages of 100% cement binder specimens after heating and cooling process. (b). Weight loss percentages of 75.5% cement and 22.5% GGBFS binder specimens after heating and cooling process. (c). weight loss percentages of 55% cement and 45% GGBFS binder specimens after heating and cooling process.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Prediction and actual results for compressive strength.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The rate of absorption with 0.4 w/b.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

The rate of absorption with 0.44 w/b.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

The rate of absorption with 0.48 w/b.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

SEM analysis of cement and GGBFS composite.

More »

Fig 18 Expand