Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Background characteristics of the sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

NBS analysis of EPELI FC contrasting ADHD and TD groups. The table shows the nodes with the highest number of significant connections in the network detected by the NBS analysis of EPELI FC contrasting ADHD and TD groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

A network revealed by NBS showing stronger FC in the ADHD group than in the TD group during EPELI gameplay.

No differences were observed in the opposite direction. The primary statistic threshold in these analyses was t = 3.5. (A) anatomical representation, (B) alluvial diagram. L = left; R = right; a number indicates the count of significant links related to the area. Both columns represent the same contrast (ADHD>TD) and were assigned to the areas for visualization purposes.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The network revealed by NBS that was positively associated with Task Efficacy in EPELI game in the TD group.

Age and gender were included as covariates. The primary statistic threshold in these analyses was t = 4. (A) anatomical representation, (B) alluvial diagram. L = left; R = right; a number indicates the count of significant links related to the brain area. Both columns represent the same contrast and were assigned to the areas for visualization purposes.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The results of the link-based analysis for FC differences between the groups during Video Viewing task.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The FC network in Video Viewing detected by NBS that was positively associated with Task Efficacy in EPELI in the TD group.

The NBS results were obtained with the primary statistics threshold of t = 4. Age and gender were included as covariates.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The FC network in Video Viewing detected by NBS that was negatively associated with CBCL score in the TD group.

Age and gender were included as covariates. The primary statistic threshold in this analysis was t = 4. (A) anatomical representation, (B) alluvial diagram. L = left; R = right; a number indicates the count of significant links related to the brain area.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The network revealed by NBS method that was negatively associated with ADHD-RS in the TD group.

Age and gender were included as covariates. The primary statistic threshold was t = 4. (A) anatomical representation, (B) alluvial diagram. L = left; R = right; a number indicates the count of significant links related to the brain area.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The FC network in Resting State detected by NBS that was negatively associated with CBCL score in the TD group.

Age and gender were included as covariates. The primary statistic threshold in these analyses was t = 4. (A) anatomical representation, (B) alluvial diagram. L = left; R = right; a number indicates the count of significant links related to the brain area.

More »

Fig 7 Expand