Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The roles of the MAPK and NFκB pathways in the onset and progression of osteoarthritis.

Molecular docking is a powerful computational technique used to simulate the interaction between a compound and a protein to evaluate their binding potential. As a strong competitor to high-throughput omics, this technique has been widely used in drug discovery [10]. However, to our knowledge, no studies focused on screening anti-osteoarthritis compounds using molecular docking. This study aimed to screen potential anti-osteoarthritis compounds by docking with core human proteins in the MAPK and NFκB pathways, analyze their drug-likeness, pharmacokinetics, bioactivity, and toxicity, and test their cytotoxicity and anti-osteoarthritis effect on mouse chondrocytes.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Study design.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Distribution of phi and psi of residues.

A, B, and L indicate most favored regions. a, b, l, and p indicate additional allowed regions. ~ a, ~ b, ~ l, and ~ p indicate generously allowed regions. Triangles indicate glycine residues.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Bonding energies (kcal/mol) of molecular dockings between compounds and proteins.

Compounds were ranked from lowest to highest based on the first binding energy score formula.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Positional relationships between compounds and ERK2 and interactions between compounds and residues.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Positional relationships between compounds and JNK2 and interactions between compounds and residues.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Positional relationships between compounds and p38 and interactions between compounds and residues.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Positional relationships between compounds and p65 and interactions between compounds and residues.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Positional relationships between compounds and I

κBα and interactions between compounds and residues.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Interactions between compounds and residues.

The top 10 compounds ranked based on the second binding energy score formula are Sesamolin, Rutaecarpine, Corilagin, Apigetrin, Gamabufotalin, Protopine, Viaminate, 5-methoxyflavone, 7,3’,4’-Trihydroxyisoflavone, and Savinin (S6 Table).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Type II collagen and DAPI immunofluorescence staining images of mouse chondrocytes.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 1.

Drug-likeness analysis of selected compounds based on Lipinski’s rule of 5.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetic prediction of selected compounds.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Molinspiration bioactivity score of selected compounds.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Toxicity prediction of selected compounds.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 12.

Cell viability of mouse chondrocytes at 24 h after treatment with compounds.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

NO concentration in the mouse chondrocyte culture medium at 24 h after treatment with compounds.

“*” indicates P < 0.05. “**” indicates P < 0.01. “***” indicates P < 0.001. “****” indicates P < 0.0001.

More »

Fig 13 Expand