Fig 1.
Example stimulus, Study 1.
Table 1.
Proportions of participants indicating the higher-efficacy/symptom-present program is more ethical, and total number of participant responses, in Study 1, by stimulus pair and condition.
Table 2.
Proportions of Response Type by Item.
Table 3.
Correlation Matrix, Study 2.
Fig 2.
Example of an Item from the Commission Condition.
Table 4.
t-tests Between High and Low Efficacy Programs in Both Presentation Mode Conditions Collapsing Across the Action and Omission Manipulation.
Fig 3.
Note: Error bars represent standard errors.