Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Selection of the study participationts following the STROBE guideline.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Background characteristics of the ever-married women who have given birth in last three years preceding the survey, BDHS 2017–18 (n = 5012).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Prevalence of postpartum family planning use by months after childbirth among the ever-married women who have given birth in last three years preceding the survey, BDHS 2017–18 (n = 4081).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Cumulative percentage distribution of women who started to use modern postpartum family planning methods, distributed over the months after childbirth (0–11 months).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Cumulative survivor function to estimate the probability of postpartum modern family planning uptake among women who had given birth in three years preceding the survey, BDHS, 2017–18 (n = 4081).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Probability of not using postpatum modern family planning methods over the months after childbirth (1–12 months) by women’s place of residence using Kaplan Meier survival estimates.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Probability of not using postpatum modern family planning methods over the months after childbirth (1–12 months) by household wealth using Kaplan Meier survival estimates.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Probability of not using postpartum modern family planning methods over the months after childbirth (1–12 months) by women’s education level using Kaplan Meier survival estimates.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Association of maternal healthcare service utilization with postpartum modern family planning uptake among women who had given birth in three years preceding the survey using poison modified generalised linear model estimates: BDHS, 2017–18 (n = 4081).

More »

Table 4 Expand