Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Applied SEIR model [15].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Comparison of the cell characteristics between the in-sample and out-of-sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of the PTB IR based on the TB transmission probability estimated using the five dynamic models.

The green scatter plots indicate the observed data for individual prison cells. The dark blue line indicates the fitted line. The two vertical dashed lines represent the fitted data interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Fitted models of the negative binomial regression (NBRG) for the five dynamic models (n = 652).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

In-sample goodness-of-fit and discrimination test results of five dynamic models.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

The 10-fold cross-validation results of four dynamic models compared to the Wells–Riley model.

Light blue represents Rudnick & Milton (ACH), blue—Rudnick & Milton (L/s/p) model, yellow—Issarow et al.’s model, and red—Applied SEIR model.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Calibration plots depicting the external validation of the five dynamic models.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of accuracy and bias metrics from external validation (out-of-sample, n = 333).

More »

Table 4 Expand