Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Number of sirloin cross-section images provided in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Summary of marbling image data analysis process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The recognized marbling particles of the BMS 9 coarse marbling image (left) and the fine marbling image (right).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

List of marbling fineness index candidates.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Image partitioning illustration for F7 marbling fineness index estimation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Boxplots for comparison between BMS 9 coarse marbling group and fine marbling group of F7 marbling fineness index by step sizes.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Significance level of the separation of coarse and fine BMS-9 beef images using F7 index at step sizes from 5 to 95 tiles per image axis.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Distribution of F7 marbling fineness index at step size = 70 of 4 BMS grades.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Statistics and ANOVA results of F7 marbling fineness index at step size = 70 between groups of 4 grades.

More »

Table 3 Expand