Fig 1.
Schematic of the atlas selection method.
Table 1.
Mean and standard deviation of the average dice score and 95% Hausdorff distance (in cm) incurred by the different method of atlas selection strategies.
Fig 2.
This figure represents the segmentation performance for cMAS, MAS-SAGA, MAS-SIM, and MAS-FASA.
Fig 3.
Dice and 95HD results of the different selection strategies.
Fig 4.
The images selected in the MAS-SIM and MAS-FASA approaches contain 30 * 70 color patches. The number of rows represents 30 testing images and the number of columns represents 70 atlas images. Each row contains 5 images selected by MAS-SIM indicated in yellow, and 5 images selected by MAS-FASA indicated in red. The orange patches indicate those images were selected by both MAS-SIM and MAS-FASA. The green patches indicate that the image was not selected.
Table 2.
Average time cost of cMAS, MAS-SAGA, MAS-SIM, and MAS-FASA.